![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi there,
I have the 2.0 rulebook, plus the 2.1 and 2.2 ammendmends to the rules add ons. I have been using the unofficial guide and rapid reference sheets extensively 8specially the later). On Saturday, in Zaragoza's tournament a french player pointed me out that thwere might be a mistake there in the unofficial: According to him, Ps do NOT provide rear support to Ax vs Wb. Is this the case? I would like to know it from a straight 2.2 publication if possible, just in case the add on sheets I have just missed the point. The unofficial says they do, but the frenchmen say it does not, and they seem to have the rulebook with them :P Is this a UDBAG mistake? Cheers, Xavi |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't have the 2.2 rulebook with me at the moment (being at work), but I am 99% certain that Auxilia DO get Ps rearsupport against Warband and mounted. I'll check when I get home to my rulebook.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
V2.2 p10 para. 4
Spears, Blades or Auxilia add +1 if fighting mounted troops or Warband or attacking a BUA or camp while supported by a single element of Psiloi lined up in contact directly behind them or directly behind a friendly element of the same type in side edge and front corner-to-front corner contact with them. Scott |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 2.0 version of the rulebook said (page 10, paragraph 4):
"Spears, Blades or Auxilia add +1 if fighting mounted troops while supported by a single friendly element of psiloi lined up in contact directly behind them or directly behind a friendly element of the same type in side edge and front corner-to-front corner contact with them." No mentioning of warbands here, so they must have been added in the 2.1 or 2.2 version, I guess. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aaagh! Pope in Birmingham, Pope in Avignon. The great DBA schism. I suspect somebody wanted Late Romans beefed up a bit.
Scott |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
One interesting thing to keep in mind with this interaction: auxilia get the +1 for psiloi support even in bad going. Warband get a +1 for double ranks, but not in bad going. - Jack |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cheers!
So I was playing it right. Cool RThanks for answering. Greatly appreciated. Xavi |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In 2.1 was introduced this upgrade
Page 10 Paragraph 6. Line 1. Insert "Or attacking a BUA or camp" after "troops". Nothing about Warbands. So support against warbands should be introduced in v2.2. Does anybody can tell me where can I find the changes from 2.1 to 2.2? Thanks |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() An unofficial list of changes from 2.1 to 2.2 can be found in the Files section of the Yahoo DBA group: http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/DBA/files/ Look for UnofficialAmendmentsDBA2_2.doc - Jack |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|