![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hope none of my book 1 and book 2 armies get changed
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Has Book 4 been done with regard to the Mongols, if anyone with the list can satisfy my curiousity?
![]() Jeff
__________________
“A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition.” – Rudyard Kipling …we didn’t carry military manuals around with us… we were out on the veldt fighting the Boer the way he fought us…. I’ll tell you what rule we applied sir, we applied Rule Three-OH-Three …. we caught them and we shot them under Rule Three-OH-Three!!!! Breaker Morant |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jeff,
at this stage the only real change is that it allows more choice beteen Cv and LH whilst still allowing the old list to run ![]() IV/35 Mongol Conquest army: 1 x General (Cv), 2 x Mongol armoured cavalry (Cv) or horse archers (LH), 5 x Mongol horse archers (LH), 1 x Mongol horse archers (LH) or rope-pull stone throwers (Art), 3 x Uighur, Khitan, Khwarizmian or Chinese cavalry (Cv) or Uighur, Cuman, Kipchak, Turkoman or Mongol horse archers (LH). Cheers
__________________
Because it has my troops all over it. That makes it MINE!!! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which is good news IF you are a Norman and plan to invade
![]() I guess it is time for historical theories to come full circle and assume that Hastings was a forgone conclusion because the Norman military system of feudal mounted knights was superior in all ways to the Saxon system of Royal Huscarls, Select Fyrd and great Fyrd. ![]() Not seeing a way for the Anglo Danes to stand up to Normans now ![]() Cheers
__________________
Because it has my troops all over it. That makes it MINE!!! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Adrian - at best this is a vain hope I would think
Cheers
__________________
Because it has my troops all over it. That makes it MINE!!! |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have to admit I'm scared to look! (new army lists)
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just catching up after a weeks holiday.
I assume from what Joe and Bob have said is that Phil is releasing the updated lists but only to the play testers rather than as previously to the DBA Community at large via the yahoo group. Is that correct, and if so do you know if there is an intention for a wider release/consultation?
__________________
Martyn |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Previously" Phil also vetted it with a small group before he released it to the public. I believe it is his intention to present it to players later.
__________________
"Bob please, stop being such a Philaphile! " DS But I really do like the guy and enjoy his rules, even though he calls me "Bitchy" Bob Last edited by Bobgnar; 07-31-2012 at 02:32 PM. Reason: added "to" before "players" |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I look forward to that little bun fight.
__________________
Martyn |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes that's what I was thinking
thank you for the reply also![]() Regards Adrian. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|