Posting rules beginning in April

[Dusty the Mighty]

I am trying to make posting as simple and clear as possible for both the players and myself. Would it be helpful to players if they could list opponents numerically from the list and separately list their armies numerically at the bottom of their post? Should I alter the posting rules one more time? :D

[khwchan888 the Dragon]

I would prefer the listing of the opponents based on their osition in the league in ascending order in the old format and seperately list the armies used in ascending order.

[ March 29, 2003, 08:38: Message edited by: khwchan888 ]

[imported_Paulisper]

Dusty - Can you give us an example of what this would look like and then we can make a decision on which would be easier...? :D

[Dusty the Mighty]

Originally posted by Paulisper:
Dusty - Can you give us an example of what this would look like and then we can make a decision on which would be easier...? :D Here is one. It combines uses last month's rules wherein you post players in the order they are on the rungs. That way you can more easily keep track of them. At the bottom, you list your wins/losses/no replies, and also the armies you used in numerical order so I can more easily tally them.

*************************
Rungs 3-4

11. 100 (Dark) vs Almogaver 95 L
12. 138 (Medieval) vs Scottila 139 L
13. 64 vs (Classical) Richard III 55b L
14. 21a (Ancient) vs Blackstone 28a L
15. Pierre de Chartreuse – no reply

16. self
17. 36 vs Sven 33 L
18. 136 vs Belisarius(2) 131b Unf
19. 30b vs Teltest 30a W
20. 24c vs Outrider Jim 24b W

2 wins smile.gif , 5 losses :( , 1 unf, 1 no reply

Armies used: 21a,24,30b,36,64,100,136,138
*************************

[ March 30, 2003, 08:55: Message edited by: Dusty the Mighty ]

[Kachoudas]

Dusty, whatever is best for you and reduce your work load will be fine for me. For the players' work load, I think any solution would be light enough and those who do not comply to the actual system will not comply to any system...

When you've made your choice, I suggest that you put the exemple not only in the rules, but also at the beginning of the corresponding topic.

[ March 30, 2003, 10:18: Message edited by: Kachoudas ]

[Kachoudas]

:confused: Just wondering... to the experts in this community ? there are many web pages of campaigns that allows players to create custom armies and send them to moderator. Do anyone know how hard it would be to automate the rsults ? Ie : a web page where you have some drop-down menu with all participant (you and opponent), army numbers, and W/L results, and would collect them in one text file (eventually another web page) with all datas in good order ?

Is it pure fantasy, or would it be technically and 'timely' possible ?

[imported_Paulisper]

Originally posted by Dusty the Mighty:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Paulisper:
Dusty - Can you give us an example of what this would look like and then we can make a decision on which would be easier...? :D Here is one. It combines uses last month's rules wherein you post players in the order they are on the rungs. That way you can more easily keep track of them. At the bottom, you list your wins/losses/no replies, and also the armies you used in numerical order so I can more easily tally them.

*************************
Rungs 3-4

11. 100 (Dark) vs Almogaver 95 L
12. 138 (Medieval) vs Scottila 139 L
13. 64 vs (Classical) Richard III 55b L
14. 21a (Ancient) vs Blackstone 28a L
15. Pierre de Chartreuse – no reply

16. self
17. 36 vs Sven 33 L
18. 136 vs Belisarius(2) 131b Unf
19. 30b vs Teltest 30a W
20. 24c vs Outrider Jim 24b W

2 wins smile.gif , 5 losses :( , 1 unf, 1 no reply

Armies used: 21a,24,30b,36,64,100,136,138
************************* </font>[/QUOTE]This looks absolutely fine and dandy - would be more than happy to go with this....

[Kachoudas]

Dusty, I have a rule question - not sure this is the correct place, but I couldn't find a better one.

If I challenged someone with an army but the chalenge wasn't answered, does this army count as being 'used' ?

[Parmenio]

New format looks good to me!

[Marco]

Originally posted by Kachoudas:
Dusty, I have a rule question - not sure this is the correct place, but I couldn't find a better one.

If I challenged someone with an army but the chalenge wasn't answered, does this army count as being 'used' ? No. It's under the rules " how to post".

"Do not post armies when players do not reply."

~Marco

[Bid the meek]

Originally posted by Dusty the Mighty:
*************************
Rungs 3-4

11. 100 (Dark) vs Almogaver 95 L
12. 138 (Medieval) vs Scottila 139 L
13. 64 vs (Classical) Richard III 55b L
14. 21a (Ancient) vs Blackstone 28a L
15. Pierre de Chartreuse – no reply

16. self
17. 36 vs Sven 33 L
18. 136 vs Belisarius(2) 131b Unf
19. 30b vs Teltest 30a W
20. 24c vs Outrider Jim 24b W

2 wins smile.gif , 5 losses :( , 1 unf, 1 no reply

Armies used: 21a,24,30b,36,64,100,136,138
************************* This is my usollicited suggestion :D
Post it as an example in the results thread. That way there will be even less reasons for us(I include myself in the us smile.gif ) to get it wrong.

[ March 31, 2003, 10:21: Message edited by: Bid the meek ]

[Dusty the Mighty]

Originally posted by Bid the meek:
This is my usollicited suggestion :D
Post it as an example in the results thread. That way there will be even less reasons for us(I include myself in the us smile.gif ) to get it wrong. Already thought of it. ;)