PDA

View Full Version : Lists IV dismounting and double-based


sue@wrg.me.uk
07-12-2011, 04:32 AM
Hi everyone. Thanks to those who have sent me emails.

On the above topic, I'm tackling this in two stages.

STAGE ONE - remove ALL reference in the lists.

STAGE TWO - put it back for those armies for whom is it an essential and well-documented part of their tactics.

I've now completed Stage One and am starting Stage Two. I am ready to receive emails suggesting armies for whom it is appropriate. Please include army number (IV/??) and cite examples to support your case. (Note a comment in DBMM lists that A may dismount as B is not sufficient for their inclusion in DBA lists - I need some extra evidence.)

Sue

PS If you've already replied to my message on the Yahoo group (or vice-versa) I don't need it twice.

David Constable
07-12-2011, 05:53 AM
Sue, if you ignore DBMM then everybody is being asked to submit all that information again.

Since it has already been sorted for DBMM, start from that, and ask why not, and for any additions.

If not, how many years do yo have?

David Constable

Tony Aguilar
07-12-2011, 09:54 AM
David has a good point.

If DBMM represents the best latest research available done by the top people in the field (Duncan Head etc..) why would we not base the DBA lists on the info provided in the DBMM lists?